Posted by rich in March 19th, 2010 |
no comment
The author of Political Nevada questioned the competency of teachers in Nevada. Saying that there needs to be a proficiency test.
Here is his opening paragraph:
Everytime the results come back in a comparison study concerning the quality of education in Nevada, someone will defend the poor quality of education by saying that the lack of money for reducing the amount of students by hiring more teachers is the reason. That is not the reason, that is an excuse.
I agree that there needs to be some sort of criteria by which teachers are judged. Like the tests that were applied as part of the no child left behind project. Of course those tests are now being thrown out because of the high failure rate, and you can rest assured that the teacher’s union would find a way to strong arm our elected officials into throwing out any tests that reflected badly on their members.
Perhaps suggesting some sort of proficiency testing is just shouting into the wind, but something needs to be done.
We have classes that are being taught primarily in Spanish with just a few English speaking students and we have classes being taught primarily in English with just a few Spanish speaking students.
Can you imagine the frustration of the teacher who has a room full of students and must now make an extra effort to redo every lesson for a few English/Spanish speakers. This situation is unfair to all parties involved, but is addressed by a principle who says “there’s nothing I can do,” or worse, a school district that says “there’s nothing we can do” because “our numbers say…”
To top it off the rules make it all but impossible for a student to transfer to another school, even if they can provide their own transportation, because the district is divided along lines on a map that are apparently chiseled in stone.
The problem isn’t that we must educate the children of people who are here illegally, any more than the solution to improved education in primarily minority schools was to bus students across town based on skin color. The problem is a system that is driven by numbers, with no room for common sense or caring in the slightest for an individual child’s welfare.
This situation exists because numbers are easy to manipulate, and most so called educators in upper management are not educators but political creatures who got where they are based on a college degree and a better than average line of bullshit, who are hired by politicians to shuffle things around, making certain not to disturb the underlying policies, touting whatever minor changes they make as great improvements. Then when the situation becomes untenable, they take the fall, so that the politicians never need to take the blame for their own failures.
Once again we are back to the politicians. they are the ones who have the final authority, but would rather spend money on beautifying a school or building a new building, than facing up to their responsibilities and fixing the problem. –Which is a lack of basic education across the board.
A final thought: Why is it that the European and Japanese education systems consistently turn out students who’s test scores surpass those of the US?